Did you miss the IP latest? Not to worry, the 202nd edition of Never Too Late is out!
Pharma: Competition & IP
Looking
to discuss the latest developments in competition law in the pharma sector?
Here’s an event for you taking place on 4 December in
Brussels. See Kat Eleonora’s post for more details (and for a special discount
for IPKat readers!).
The Patent Information Initiative for Medicines (Pat-INFORMED), is a newly creted database through which patent holders provide information about patents covering approved medicines: a database of information but also a communication platform between procurement agencies and pharmaceutical companies. In Public procurement of pharmaceuticals and the patent system, the first date of a stormy relationship? Kat Frantzeska discusses the issue.
 |
| Kat dilemmas upon arrival in the Belgian capital |
Trade marks
What
may be the main (potential) events in the life of an EU/national trade mark?
Here's a new map from Kat Eleonora. The map can be downloaded from this page.
Computer-Implemented Inventions
Kat Eibhlin informed readers about the Event:
Computer-Implemented Inventions - Monday 8 Oct 2018 which involved presentations from the technical board of appeal responsible for examining appeals in the fields of computing and computer-implemented inventions.
Copyright
How far does the control of the copyright holder go in relation to unauthorized uses of their works? Can
warehouse storage of copyright-infringing products be considered an act of
distribution? AG Campos advises CJEU to rule 'yes', reported by Kat Eleonora.
Copyright
monetisation: does technology help or hinder? IPWeek @ SG 2018 whereby the panel, composed by Cheah Yew Kuin, Ngiam Keemin, Yeo Kok Siew and Cedric Manara, and Kat Neil as reporter, addressed the question at hand.
Never
Too Late 201 [Weeks ending 23 and 30 Sep] UK copyright in a no-deal Brexit scenario: what will happen? | No deal
Brexit - what does it mean for exhaustion of rights? |No deal Brexit - what
will happen to patents - particularly SPCs and the UPC? No deal Brexit - what
does it mean for registered Community designs and trade marks | Will there be a
“Fiverrization” of the creative industries? | IPWeek @ SG: IP Offices still
searching for (the holy grail) of innovation and incentives: the view from | IPWeek
@ SG AIPPI Congress Report 1: Standard essential patents – maximizing value
before enforcement | AIPPI Congress Report 2: Out of term - provisional and
post term patent enforcement | AIPPI Congress Report 3: Hot topics in IP | and
AIPPI Congress Report 4: A balancing act - copyright versus other rights | How
Singapore Is Fast-Tracking FinTech Patent Applications (and making more
"Crazy Rich Asians"? | Evolving concepts of work and sustainability
of copyright: the curious case of curated fireworks displays | US Copyright
Office Review Board denies registration of ‘Vodafone Speechmark’ | After UEFA’s
Starball logo, also the EURO Trophy has been denied copyright registration | Using
copyright-protected material as evidence in a court proceeding | Paris tribunal
guts Twitter’s T&Cs… including the copyright clause for user-generated
content | Around the IP Blogs!
Never
Too Late 200 [Week ending 16 Sep] |
BREAKING: FCJ refers case regarding YouTube’s liability for damages to the CJEU
| Fashion, algorithms, and copyright: is it all about what we want or rather
what we didn't know we want? | Time for a break - catching up with KitKat |
Book review: The Economics of Open Access – on the Future of Academic
Publishing |
Never
Too Late 199 [Week ending 9 Sep] What
does a no deal Brexit mean for trade marks and designs? | Copyright and
tattoos: where are we now? | Swedish Supreme Court to rule on damages relating
to online copyright | CJEU back in ‘Hot Water’ – when are infringing goods
being ‘offered’? | A bagel is a bagel is a bagel, and a pita is a pita is a
pita: but is a bialy a cebularz?
Never
Too Late 198 [Week ending 17 June] BREAKING:
CJEU rules that Louboutin red sole mark does NOT fall within absolute ground
for refusal | The Broad's CRISPR patent: The curious case of the missing
declaration | Kymouse's stay of execution | The AmeriKat's Top 3 upcoming IP
summer events | BREAKING: UK Supreme Court rules that ISPs do NOT have to pay
implementation costs in Cartier case | who should control the 1500-year old
monastery manuscript of the Garima Gospels? | Mexican GIs and the registry of
foreign GIs and AOs | Around the IP Blogs!
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Cecilia Sbrolli
on
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Rating:
Reviewed by Cecilia Sbrolli
on
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html