Another week approaching its end means another Around the IP blogs feature!
Copyright
In Pirate streaming in New Zealand of the 2019 Rugby World Cup, The 1709 Blog discusses the right of communication in New Zealand.
Trade marks
The Kluwer Trademark Blog reports on the Argentina's latest changes in trade marks and a recent decision of the French Supreme Court which found that complementarity between products and services is relevant to a finding of likelihood of confusion.
IPWatchdog hosts a post analyzing the stricter rules for acquiring and maintaining trade mark registration implemented by the USPTO.
Patents
PatentlyO takes a look at a few cases: Infinity Headwear & Apparel, Docket No. 18-01998 (Fed. Cir. 2019), Peter v. NantKwest, Inc., No. 18-801 (Supreme Court 2019) and BTG Int’l. Ltd. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC (Fed. Cir. 2019).
IPR Carousel
The Kluwer Trademark Blog publishes two posts about Uruguay: Uruguay: Trade Dress recognized for the first time in Usd 500,000 damages awards and ISPs forced to block illegal streaming website in Uruguay.
Copyright
In Pirate streaming in New Zealand of the 2019 Rugby World Cup, The 1709 Blog discusses the right of communication in New Zealand.
Trade marks
The Kluwer Trademark Blog reports on the Argentina's latest changes in trade marks and a recent decision of the French Supreme Court which found that complementarity between products and services is relevant to a finding of likelihood of confusion.
IPWatchdog hosts a post analyzing the stricter rules for acquiring and maintaining trade mark registration implemented by the USPTO.
 |
| Stricter rules? |
PatentlyO takes a look at a few cases: Infinity Headwear & Apparel, Docket No. 18-01998 (Fed. Cir. 2019), Peter v. NantKwest, Inc., No. 18-801 (Supreme Court 2019) and BTG Int’l. Ltd. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC (Fed. Cir. 2019).
IPR Carousel
The Kluwer Trademark Blog publishes two posts about Uruguay: Uruguay: Trade Dress recognized for the first time in Usd 500,000 damages awards and ISPs forced to block illegal streaming website in Uruguay.
Around the IP blogs
Reviewed by Antonella Gentile
on
Sunday, May 19, 2019
Rating:
Reviewed by Antonella Gentile
on
Sunday, May 19, 2019
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html