Fordham 27 Recap: Reports 1-14

Tired of the numerous e-mails you were getting from the AmeriKat reporting on the Fordham IP Conference?   Filing them away for reading "later"?  Forgetting what the reports were even covering and which may be of relevance to you?  Well, the AmeriKat hears you so has compiled a compendium of all the Fordham IP Conference posts below, so you don't miss any of the reporting from her, Eleonora, the fabulous guest Fordham Kats - Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) and Alexander van Leeuw (Brinkhof) and Richard Vary (Bird & Bird).

The reports are as follows: 

Report 1:  Key Current IP Issues - Reflections & Analysis:    (click here)

Report 2:  IP - Past, Present & Future (click here)

Report 3:  DMCA - 20 Years Later  (click here)

Report 4:  Government Leaders' Perspectives on IP (click here)

Report 5:  In-House Counsel (click here)

Report 6:  FRAND (click here)

Report 7:  AI (click here)

Report 8:  Second Medical Use/ Plausibility (click here)

Report 9: Biologics and Biosimilars (click here)

Report 10: Patent Potpurri (click here)

Report 11:  Views from the Judicial Decision Makers (click here)

Report 12:  SPCs (click here)

Report 13:  PTAB (click here)

Report 14: Priority (click here)

Fordham 27 Recap: Reports 1-14 Fordham 27 Recap:  Reports 1-14 Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Tuesday, May 07, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.