A few upcoming
events for you to take a look at. Some readers from the UK can enjoy perusing these
on the Bank Holiday Monday!
The International
Intellectual Property Law Association still have some spaces at their conference
IIPLA 4th Annual Meeting 2019 USA at Palo Alto, USA on 24 & 25 September,
2019. The conference will cover issues and opportunities to assist IP law firms
and IP legal businesses increase their overall performance, profitability and
levels of IT security to enhance their ROI and achieve a strong sense of
Intellectual Property with the key expertise garnering from all around the
world. Registration is available here.
The Competition
Law Association are hosting a lunchtime meeting on Wednesday 19 June with
speakers on “Implementation of the Trade Mark Directive and exhaustion
post-Brexit”. Details and registration is available here.
 |
| One Kat experiencing a bout of exhaustion |
Finally, the
Intellectual Property Lawyers Organisation is hosting a dinner on 11 June at Gray’s
Inn on Copyright v. Fundamental Rights in the EU. The Grand Chamber of the Court
of Justice of the European Union is currently deliberating on three copyright
cases – Funke Medien, Pelham and Spiegel Online involving a clash between
copyright and other fundamental rights. Judging by the Opinions issued by
Advocate General Szpunar, the decisions in these cases are likely to be
significant to the development of EU copyright law. Nicholas Saunders QC
represented the United Kingdom in all three cases and will discuss the issues. Registration
is open here.
Sunday Surprises
Reviewed by Jonathan Pratt
on
Sunday, May 26, 2019
Rating:
Reviewed by Jonathan Pratt
on
Sunday, May 26, 2019
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html