Mandatory mediation in Greece: Odysseus reaches Ithaca

Kat friend Marina Perraki summarizes the just concluded legislative enactment in Greece to introduce a form of mandatory, including with respect to IP infringement actions.

We have previously reported on Greece’s legislative initiative to introduce mandatory mediation in certain civil and commercial disputes, including trademark infringement disputes.

The respective law, 4512/2018, had been enacted, but its entry into force was postponed, following reactions of lawyers and bar associations. As a result, the drafting of a new law was commenced. After the conclusion of the public consultation, a final draft was submitted to Parliament, and it was approved by the Plenary on November 28, 2019.

Published the following day, on November 29, 2019, it is now law no 4640/2019 “Mediation on civil and commercial disputes – Further harmonization of Greek legislation with Directive 2008/52/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 21 May 2008 and other provisions” (the Law).

The purpose of the Law is to reform the mediation provisions and “further” implement EU Directive 2008/52/EC of 21.5.2008, as implemented by the first Greek mediation law, namely law 3898/2010 “Mediation in civil and commercial disputes” and the second Greek mediation law, 4512/2018. Notably, the first Greek mediation law 3898/2010 had only provided for voluntary mediation (as does the said Directive). It was law 4512/2018 and the Law that introduced mandatory mediation.

The main difference from the previous law (4512/2018) is that mandatory mediation has now been expanded to cover all disputes above a monetary claim of 30,000 euros. It applies also to all non- monetary claims (e.g. claims aimed at enjoining an IP infringement).

To be clear: what according to the Law is "mandatory" is only the “initial mediation session”, in which the mediator informs the parties on the nature of the mediation process. This is in contrast with the previous law, which, even though it in effect also provided for only a first mandatory mediation session (after or even during which the parties were free to leave without any consequence), it was “mandatory mediation”.

If, under the Law, the parties agree to mediate as a consequence of the first mandatory mediation session, the parties will then need to enter into a written mediation agreement and the mediation process shall continue as a voluntary one. The fees involved in the first mandatory session are much lower than under the previous law. The presence of lawyers of the parties is obligatory both in the first mandatory meeting as well as for the rest of the mediation process.

The Law was drafted in order for the Greek legislation to conform also with the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the case C-729/2017. In that decision, the CJEU found that: “The Greek State, by limiting the legal form of education bodies of mediations, to non profit organisations, in which at least one bar association and at least one chamber of commerce must participate as founders” was violating art. 15 par. 2, ind. b and c, and par. 3 of Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market.

Also, by subjecting the recognition of accreditation of mediators obtained in other EU member states to further conditions, it went beyond EU law.

The Law also aims at amending the previous mandatory mediation provisions so that they conform with a Greek Supreme Court opinion that held that mandatory mediation, as set out in law 4512/2018, was obstructing the right of access to justice.

According to the new provisions, the plaintiff’s lawyer, either before or upon filing the lawsuit, shall a) inform its client about mediation and the first mandatory mediation session where applicable (this obligation is already in force since November 20, 2019, upon publication of the Law); and b) for those disputes for which a mandatory first mediation session is provided, agree with the other party on appointment of a mediator, or submit a unilateral request to a mediator of his choice.

The mediator shall then seek the defendant's agreement to the appointment, if not appointed with the defendant’s consent. If the defendant does not agree (or the mediator cannot locate and communicate with the defendant), the mediator shall be appointed by an independent body, the Central Mediation Committee.
                                                                                       "There it is--Ithaca"

Then the plaintiff shall send a written request to the mediator so appointed for commencement of the process and the mediator shall schedule the first mediation session. This shall be conducted within 20 days after the request by the plaintiff to the mediator, if the parties reside in Greece, and within 30 days, if any of the parties resides abroad. The mediation must be concluded 40 days thereafter. The parties may agree on an extension.

Under the Greek Civil Procedure Code, the parties must submit their written pleadings and evidence within 100 days (or 130 days if the defendant resides or is located abroad) from the filing of the law suit. This deadline is suspended under the new Law, from the moment that the mediator sends written notice of the mediation to the parties, until either the first mandatory session is terminated unsuccessfully, or a mediation that has continued thereafter terminates, or any of the parties leaves the mediation.

The parties (unless this is impossible pursuant to a list of circumstances), as well as their legal representatives, must all appear at the first mandatory session. The mediation may also be performed via teleconference. If, at the first session, the parties decide that they do not wish to enter into a full mediation process, the mediator shall compile appropriate minutes, and the parties shall submit them to the court.

Failure to submit to the court: a) evidence, as provided in the Law, that the parties have been informed of the mediation and the first mediation session; and b) evidence as provided under the Law for conducting the first mediation session, shall result to the law suit being dismissed as inadmissible. Monetary sanctions may also be imposed by the court for failure of a party to appear at the first mediation session.

As regards voluntary mediation, the Law substitutes all pre-existing provisions, but the new ones are in fact virtually identical to those under the previous law.

If the mediation takes place and the parties reach an agreement, this result must be explicitly stated as part of the minutes prepared by the mediator and signed by all mediation participants. The written minutes may be submitted to the court secretariat and upon such submission the minutes shall have full enforceable legal effect. Any party may initiate enforcement proceedings against the other, in the event of non-compliance, on the basis of such minutes.

The new mandatory mediation provisions will enter into force in March 15, 2020 for all disputes (except for family law disputes, for which they shall enter into force on January 15, 2020).The above does not apply to interim measures, such that mediation does not preclude the parties from seeking injunctive relief from the court. Further, the first mandatory session provisions do not apply when a preliminary injunction is filed.

The goal of the new law, which has been the aim of the Greek legislator since the legislative introduction of mediation in Greece in 2010, is to provide material relief for the case overload experienced in Greek civil courts.

More on Odysseus and Ithaca, here and here.

Photo of map on the upper left is by Lencer and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribtion-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Mandatory mediation in Greece: Odysseus reaches Ithaca Mandatory mediation in Greece: Odysseus reaches Ithaca Reviewed by Neil Wilkof on Thursday, December 05, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.