IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2019: Nominate your favourite IP Book of the year!

As the Christmas season is in full swing, it can mean only one thing dear readers of the IPKat blog and IP books, it is time again to nominate your favourite IP books of the year!

Us Kats love a good IP read, and over 2019 the IPKat has brought to you many book reviews of titles in all areas of IP. Take a look for some inspiration, but any book may be nominated for the awards.
Pawsing to consider my favourite books,
whilst focusing on not mentioning another recent vote...
Image: Manuel Cacciatori

Back by popular demand, the IPKat will again open an opportunity for readers to nominate and celebrate their favourite IP books of 2019. See the 2018 award winners here.

This year we will continue the tradition with the same catergories of nomination; Patent, trade mark, copyright, design and Intellectual Property. You can nominate as many books as you like in as many categories as you wish.

Click here to take the survey here, before 31st December 2019. 

All you need to do is provide the name of the author(s) and the title of the book you would like to win in the box provided. You do not have to answer every question of the survey.

The winners will be those books with the most nominations from the survey, which will be announced in early Janurary 2020.

IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2019: Nominate your favourite IP Book of the year! IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2019: Nominate your favourite IP Book of the year! Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher on Saturday, December 14, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.