According to FindLaw, the US Supreme Court has decided to allow the claim of the civil rights activist Rosa Parks to go ahead against the rap group OutKast. Ms Parks famously refused to give up her seat and move to the back on the bus in 1955 in Alabama. Her subsequent arrest led to demonstrations followed by the end of segregation on public transportation in the South. OutKast released a track called “Rosa Parks” which, although unconnected in subject matter with Ms Parks contains the line “Ah, ha, hush that fuss. Everybody move to the back of the bus”. Parks, who had previously endorsed a gospel album in her honour, sued for false advertising, infringement of her right to publicity, defamation and interference with a business relationship. All Parks’ claims were rejected at first instance, but the Court of Appeals allowed her false advertising and publicity rights cases. OutKast appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the use of trade mark rights and publicity rights conflicted with its constitutional right to free speech but the Supreme Court rejected OutKast’s case, and the case will continue in the lower courts.

The IPKat thinks that it sound a little odd to be talking about false advertising and publicity rights when the real problem seems to be that OutKast are taking advantage of Mrs Park’s name and reputation for no particularly good reason. Presumably this isn’t a use that she would license so she’s not losing out in that way, though the IPKat notes that in this case Parks had previously been involved with (a rather different) record.

All aboard here, here, here, here, here and here

BACK OF THE BUS CAUSES A FUSS BACK OF THE BUS CAUSES A FUSS Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 09, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.