The New York Times reports that Microsoft is to ease its licensing policy. In future, it will be more willing to allow others to make use of its patent and copyright-protected technology. The move is at least in part designed to counter the criticism to which Microsoft has been subject during antitrust actions in both the US and EU. Some of the licensing is due to be royalty-free, particularly to industry groups setting software standards for machine-to-machine communication and data sharing. Also announced were plans to licence ClearType, which is software for presenting near-print-quality text on a liquid crystal display computer screen, and FAT file storage technology so that they can serve as a model for other producers to develop their software on.
The IPKat welcomes any moves to make technology more available to others but, being a cynical beast, he notes that there could be a hidden agenda behind such steps. If Microsoft is not going to get a monopoly on software for performing different functions, by licensing, it can ensure that its technology becomes the industry standard and that other people's products are compatible with its software and operating systems.
Licences here and here
The IPKat welcomes any moves to make technology more available to others but, being a cynical beast, he notes that there could be a hidden agenda behind such steps. If Microsoft is not going to get a monopoly on software for performing different functions, by licensing, it can ensure that its technology becomes the industry standard and that other people's products are compatible with its software and operating systems.
Licences here and here
MICROSOFT TO LICENSE IP
![MICROSOFT TO LICENSE IP]()
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Friday, December 05, 2003
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html