Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!
The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!
The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Oliver Fairhurst and Marcel Pemsel.
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Anastasiia Kyrylenko (Book Review Editor).
InternKats: Simone Lorenzi and Asude Sena Moya.
Home/Jeremy and Ilanah / PUTTING THE BOOT IN: DOC MARTENS FLATTEN LOGO COPYRIGHT ASSIGNEES
PUTTING THE BOOT IN: DOC MARTENS FLATTEN LOGO COPYRIGHT ASSIGNEES
In R Griggs Group Ltd, R Griggs & Co Ltd and Airware Ltd v Ross Evans, Raben Footwear Pty Ltd, Ronny Leopold Lewy and Garry Lewy [2003] EWHC 2914 (Ch), on 2 December, Deputy Chancery judge Peter Prescott QC had to tackle the question of ownership of copyright in a trade mark-protected logo. Griggs made and sold "Dr Martens" boots. These boots all bore the DR MARTENS trade mark (which Griggs used under licence) as well as a second trade mark AIRWAIR, which Griggs owned. In 1988 a combined logo was designed, incorporating both DR MARTENS and AIRWAIR. The combined logo was designed by Evans, a freelance graphic designer for the advertising agency retained by Griggs. The other defendants took an assignment of copyright from Evans on the basis that he, not Griggs, was the first owner of the copyright. Griggs sued for a declaration that it was the beneficial owner of the copyright in the combined logo. Peter Prescott QC upheld Griggs’ claim. When a freelance designer was commissioned to create a logo for a client but the commissioning contract was silent, a term could be implied on the basis of business efficacy that the copyright should be assigned to the client so that he could prevent others using the logo. Although Evans was the legal owner of the copyright in the combined logo when he created it, he was not entitled to beneficial ownership of it. He received his normal hourly rate to create the combined logo and it was not shown that the amount he expected to be paid would be materially affected by the use to which the combined logo was put. In the circumstances it was obvious that the right to use the logo and to exclude others from using it was to belong to Griggs, not Evans. The defendants did not agree. Said one of them: “We were shafted”.
The IPKat agrees. The defendants who took an assignment of the legal interest in the copyright were competitors of Griggs, who could not lawfully have used the combined logo in any of the countries in which Griggs traded. Business that commission logos, badges etc should however make sure they take an assignment of the copyright up front and that, where they hire a design agency that uses freelance talent, the design agency’s contract with any independent designer reflects the commercial reality. Otherwise all that happens is that, as here, the parties become embroiled in fruitless litigation as to which of them owns a copyright work which only one of them can profitably use.
PUTTING THE BOOT IN: DOC MARTENS FLATTEN LOGO COPYRIGHT ASSIGNEES
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Friday, December 12, 2003
Rating: 5
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
The IPKat: Intellectual Property News and Fun for Everyone!
How many page-views has the IPKat received?
94,682,522
Not just any old IPKat ...
* "Most Popular Intellectual Property Law Blawg" of all time according to Justia rankings, April 2025.
* "Most Popular Copyright Blawg" of all time according to Justia rankings, April 2025.
* "Best UK Intellectual Property blog" of all time according to FeedSpot, April 2025.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati has been quoted, and the IPKat has also been hyperlinked on the New York Times, April 2024.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati and The IPKat are expressly recommended as sources to follow to get an "unstuffy look at IP issues" according to Legal Business, April 2023.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati listed as one of the World Intellectual Property Review's "Influential Women in IP" of 2020.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosatilisted as one of the Managing Intellectual Property magazine's "Fifty Most Influential People" of 2018.
* IPKat founder and Blogmeister Emeritus Jeremy Phillips listed as one of the Managing Intellectual Property magazine's "Fifty Most Influential People" of 2005, 2011, 2013, and 2014.
* Recommended by the European Patent Office as reading material for candidates for the European Qualifying Examinations, 2013.
* Listed as "Top Legal Blog" in The Times Online, March 2011.
* One of the only two non-US blogs listed in the Blawg 2010 ABA Journal100.
* Court Reporter Top Copyright Blog award winner, November 2010.
* Number 1 in the 2010 Top Copyright Blog list compiled by the Copyright Litigation Blog, July 2010.
* Selected by the United States Library of Congress for inclusion in its historic collections of Internet materials related to Legal Blawgs as of 2010.
* Top Patent Blog poll 2009: 3rd out of 50 in the "Favourite Patent Blog" poll and 2nd out of 50 in the "Most-read" poll.
* ComputerWeekly IT Law and Governance Blog of the Year, 20 August 2008.
* Best of the Blogs, Times Online, 21 August 2008.
Get the Kat in your Inbox!
Over 16,400 readers already subscribe to the IPKat by email.
To subscribeclick here and enter your preferred e-mail address.
Any problems, please let the IPKat team know.
The Kat that tweets! Current followers: 22.6K
To follow the IPKat team's posts and comments on X (formerly Twitter), just click here Follow @Ipkat
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html