Regular readers of the IPKat will appreciate a good joke, particularly if it has relevance to intellectual property. Ilanah, who constitutes half of the IPKat, thought the following joke so good that we both decided to tell our friends and see who could reach a larger audience. Ilanah is winning, since she has more friends than I do, but, since I can rely on all my friends to read the IPKat blog, I thought I’d post it here.
The joke goes like this: “Question: what’s the difference between spinach and snot? Answer: you can eat snot but you can't eat spinach”. In point of fact, despite their negative connotations, both snot and spinach are represented on the UK Trade Marks Register. The SPINACH word and device mark is registered for marketing and research consultancy services in Class 35, while snot is a key ingredient of the SNOTBLASTER word mark, registered for products in Class 3.
The IPKat, who eats neither snot nor spinach, wonders whether his masters will come up with a more tasteful joke next time.
Recipes for spinach here, here and here
“I Yam What I Yam” says one famous spinach eater
Fake your own snot here and here
The fruit of the nose here
The joke goes like this: “Question: what’s the difference between spinach and snot? Answer: you can eat snot but you can't eat spinach”. In point of fact, despite their negative connotations, both snot and spinach are represented on the UK Trade Marks Register. The SPINACH word and device mark is registered for marketing and research consultancy services in Class 35, while snot is a key ingredient of the SNOTBLASTER word mark, registered for products in Class 3.
The IPKat, who eats neither snot nor spinach, wonders whether his masters will come up with a more tasteful joke next time.
Recipes for spinach here, here and here
“I Yam What I Yam” says one famous spinach eater
Fake your own snot here and here
The fruit of the nose here
DO TRADE MARKS GET UP YOUR NOSE?
![DO TRADE MARKS GET UP YOUR NOSE?]()
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Monday, December 08, 2003
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html