Photographer gets lippy; TRADE MARK ATTORNEY label on the table

Pepsi's lips questioned

The Independent reports that the estate of the photographer Bob Carlos Clarke is bringing an action against Pepsi. Pepsi uses an image of a female tongue and lips in its new advertising campaign. The estate argues that "It's quite clear for anyone to see that they've just completely copied Bob's photo.” For good measure, a spokesman has added "We want adequate financial compensation for infringing his copyright and we're prepared to fight this all the way." Pepsi argues that its advertising types have never seen the Clarke photo, and so can’t have copied it.

The IPKat reckons that the estate has an uphill struggle. Lip imagery is rife, and is a particularly obvious theme in the food and drink industry.

Law Society okays trade mark title

Good news for ITMA members according to the ITMA website. ITMA and the Law Society have reached an agreement by which ITMA will be able to attempt to have the term TRADE MARK ATTORNEY as a regulated title, and will be able to register TRADE MARK ATTORNEY as a certification mark. The Law Society and ITMA have sorted out their differences, so that the Law Society are now satisfied that solicitors won’t be barred from using the title, and consumers won’t be confused into thinking that the ITMA members are lawyers.
The IPKat says that this sounds sensible. With a little bit of education, consumers should be able to easily know the difference between the two professions.
Photographer gets lippy; TRADE MARK ATTORNEY label on the table Photographer gets lippy; TRADE MARK ATTORNEY label on the table Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, October 15, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.