Today's the day...

Today's the day that the The Trade Marks (Relative Grounds) Order 2007 enters into force. What this means is that the UK-IPO will no longer automatically block trade mark applications in relation to which there is a conflict with an earlier mark on the relative grounds. Instead, the owner of the earlier mark will be notified (if it's a UK mark) and will be given the option of launching an opposition. The change has at least two principal aims: to give a level playing field to UK applicants, since OHIM does not routinely block applications on the relative grounds ex officio, and to make the system more market orientated - only marks which are valued enough by their owners to sink money into an opposition will be allowed to block applications.

The IPKat sees the wisdom in the changes. In an ideal world relative grounds examination would continue to take place, but there seem to be sound financial/competitive reasons for stopping it. However, he's a bit concerned that the interests of consumers never seems to have got a look in. Even if a trade mark owner doedn't think it worth protecting his earlier mark, if the earlier mark remains in use, a subsequent conflicting application and mark could confuse consumers.
Today's the day... Today's the day... Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, October 01, 2007 Rating: 5


  1. In some respects its a sad day that the UK abandons the integrity of its trademark register. Congratulations are however due to UK IPO for setting up their smart opt-in form TM6 which is operating very neatly and efficiently. It doesnt look as if there has been a huge early demand as the references had only barely climbed above 100 by close at 20:00. Nevertheless we have until 20 October 2007 to fill in forms for all those who love their CTMs


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.