India Express reports that the organisers of the Salt Lake FD Block Durga Puja (a festival devoted to the Hindu godess Durga) are in trouble with JK Rowling. The organisers chose Harry Potter as the theme of their Puja, and have made their pandal (a temporary structure built to venerate the goddess) in the shape of Hogwart’s school, complete with models of Potter and his chums inside. Rowling is unimpressed, and has brought an action for copyright infringement before the Delhi High Court.
The IPKat will keep his thoughts on using a commercial character for sacred purposes to himself. Instead, he’ll confine himself to musing about where the copyright infringement is here. Have the organisers actually reproduced promotional images, or those found on the book covers, or is Rowling instead attempting to assert copyright in the characters themselves, rather than a particular depiction of them? This would seem like a tall order.
The IPKat will keep his thoughts on using a commercial character for sacred purposes to himself. Instead, he’ll confine himself to musing about where the copyright infringement is here. Have the organisers actually reproduced promotional images, or those found on the book covers, or is Rowling instead attempting to assert copyright in the characters themselves, rather than a particular depiction of them? This would seem like a tall order.
Harry Potter takes on goddess
![Harry Potter takes on goddess]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html