Come rain or come shine: “” vs. “”

The Higher Regional Court of Cologne recently had to decide in a dispute of the use of the sign “” on a smartphone app for weather news. By way of background and as you may have guessed, the German word "das Wetter" (thanks for pointing out the typo) translates into the English word weather. or
The dispute had ensued between the operators of the German website and the operators of the Austrian websites and The Austrian weather site, which was also accessible as “Wetter-DE/Wetter DE/”, offered a Smartphone app called “wetter DE” via its online shop. This use did not impress German who also offered a Smartphone app via their own website. sent a warning letter to asking them to cease their use (Abmahnung) of the sign, stating the risk of a likelihood of confusion due to the high similarity, if not identity, of the signs. After an amicable settlement could not be reached, the matter went to court.

Prepared... come rain or shine
The legal bases of’s infringement claim were Articles 5 (3), 15 (1, 2, 3 4) German Trade Mark Act, which provide for the legal protection of so-called work titles (Werkitelschutz), which in its scope, albeit not ins requirements, is broadly similar to the protection of trade marks. In a nutshell: work title protection under the German Trade Mark Act differs from the protection under German copyright laws, i.e. a work title may qualify for protection under the Trade Mark Act even if it does not met the necessary level of individual creativity required under Article 2 of the German Copyright Act. Moreover, the necessary level of distinctiveness of a work title to qualify for protection under the German Trade Mark Act is lower than that required for trade marks. All that is necessary is, that consumers regard the sign as a reference to a specific work. Work titles can also be protected under the right to a name under the German Civil Code (Namensrecht) and under the laws of unfair competition.

The first instance court, the Regional Court of Cologne, decided in favour of On appeal, the Higher Regional Court of Cologne (case: 6 U 205/13 of 5 September 2014) initially confirmed that Smartphone apps could per se qualify for work title protection.  However, the sign did not possess the necessary (low) level of distinctiveness for weather related apps. In this context the Cologne judges referred to a precedent of the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) relating to domain names (WRP 2014, 194, para 34 – Tagesschau-App) and took the view that the sign “wetter” had no distinctiveness for the app but only reflected the content of the app. A mere description of the content of work was, however, not protectable under Articles 5 (3), 15 (1, 2, 3 4) German Trade Mark Act, so that’s claim failed. The judges explained that consumers would usually relate an app to a related domain and therefore regard the ending as a simple reference to the top-level domain for Germany.  The court also denied any claims under the German Act of Unfair Competition since was able to act on the market unhindered. Takeaway point: an app will only attract protection as work title under the German Trade Mark Act if it is more than a mere description of the content of the work and thus meets a certain, albeit rather low, degree of distinctiveness. in the meantime remains free to use the signs “Wetter-DE/Wetter DE/” for its apps.

While the Higher Regional Court’s decision seems logical and well reasoned, it would nonetheless be nice to have a BGH decision on this evolving field of law.  Merpel still hopes for a further appeal to the BGH.
Come rain or come shine: “” vs. “” Come rain or come shine: “” vs. “” Reviewed by Birgit Clark on Monday, December 15, 2014 Rating: 5


  1. The German word for weather translates into the English word for "more wet",I would suggest. Of course some might say there is no difference.

  2. ...and some would say that there is no difference between "Global Warming" and "climate Change."

    The objective view is of course somewhat different, and takes into account the fact that subjective humans are involved, and that wordplay abounds - for what purposes for which, I shall remain polite and reserve comment.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.