Good news, chaps – the Community Patent is not dead. The IPKat knows this after reading a press release from the EU website detailing a recent visit by European Parliamentarians to the EPO. According to the press release:
In recognition of the important role patents play in economic growth and development, the Commission is working on a Community Patent in order to save entrepreneurs the cost, effort and potential confusion of being granted protection under different national patent regimes.
Other useful gems are the fact that the EPO employs 6,000 people and that the EU press corps seem to be using the term iPod generically.
The IPKat says don’t hold your breath for the Community patent coming any time soon.
More of the undead here, here and here
EUROPEAN PATENT: NOT GONE, NOT FORGOTTEN
![EUROPEAN PATENT: NOT GONE, NOT FORGOTTEN]()
Reviewed by Unknown
on
Monday, April 18, 2005
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Retromark Volume XIII: the last six months in trade marks](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUmvqo7kBp9H9962s6yfr9pmd_Fr4VWyny7-VMQ7QkiiFa6M-qN86CJuhgSJT61AIZRqxnEUr_mRj5va9XIeJWk08KnS3ZdVyihWx_QBo1JMmWk5aZOt6qWYFjs8tWxh_fjWx_HofuNqajIeRzDfa6HTZU4BzgRCjLmivJ9hQafx5BSlJQloBjNg/s72-w640-c-h301/Screenshot%202023-11-27%20at%2011.22.42.png)
![[Guest post] Dutch Supreme Court: when due cause has already been established, no further assessment of (dis)honest practices is required](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtKazgLOmqp4ZCzB696Jau3w3m-7G9MbXZhkX27JtRqlLoc1yRLCZJXEqCvpZZzoEKZKP23qRhFfh1z5ViqL3gpM49fLX4IVHeGg1vYVQjk1u8Etnw2vZjJ2Y-11VwOsJSpX9PPYhzZrSgznfbaKRwHmQF-CrsioAmE5KltgHuoI-M6lV5ox5TMw/s72-c/996x1200.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html