The IPKat has just found
this rather good article by Drew Clark in the
Washington Post on the commercial and cultural issues that run as an undercurrent to the legal submissions that have been made to the US Supreme Court in its recent
Grokster hearing. It's refreshing to read anything that's relatively even-handed in its appraisal,in an era in which we live on a high-fibre diet of press statements by lobbyists and special interest groups.
Comments
Post a Comment
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html