The Register reports that Napster has gained 143,000 new subscribers in the past quarter, making a grand total of 410,000. Nearly a third of Napster's US subscribers (56,000) are at universities - which means that the company's strategy of marketing towards colleges is succeeding. A Register mole has apparently revealed that she and some of her student pals share a single Napster account to reduce the cost of subscribing. Apparently it's a relatively common practice for one person to pay for the £9.95 per month Napster account, distributing the username and password among several others. Our contact couldn't remember exactly how many people she'd given the details to, but stated that she knew for certain at least two other people who used her account on a regular basis. Napster says this can't happen and that the simultaneous use by two people of the same account details will result in the previous user being logged out within five minutes ...

Napster: music downloads for the coolest cats

The IPKat has great admiration for students' efforts to save money. Knowing how expensive their text books are, thanks to the massive royalties paid to their authors, they are bound to make every effort to reduce their outgoings elsewhere.

More on students sharing here and here
How to cheat here and here

Student sharing: can improve the performance of under-achievers ...
STUDENT INGENUITY KNOWS NO BOUNDS ... STUDENT INGENUITY KNOWS NO BOUNDS ... Reviewed by Jeremy on Saturday, April 09, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.