Findlaw reports that Francoise Bornet, the woman in Robert Doisneau's famous photograph of spontaneous love in Paris, has decided to auction her original print 55 years after it was taken. Bornet says Doisneau (who died in 1994) sent her an original copy of the photograph days after it was taken in 1950. In the photo, the lovers kiss, oblivious to Paris traffic and passers-by.

This photo has an interesting legal history. In 1993 Bornet unsuccessfully sued Doisneau for U$18,500 and a percentage of sales of copies of the photo. Now Bornet seeks to reclaim her identity as well as financial gains by selling the 1950 black-and-white original print, which bears the photographer's stamp on the back. The photograph will be auctioned April 25 at the Artcurial Briest Pulain le Fur auction house in Paris and is expected to sell for between euro 15-20,000. The Rapho photo agency, Doisneau's employer when he took the picture, owns the rights to the photo. Bornet himself never received royalties from the reproduction and can only sell her photograph for private use.

Can Doisneau claim resale royalty rights? Click here and put your thinking cap on.
Other famous kisses here, here and here
KISS FOR SALE KISS FOR SALE Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Rating: 5


  1. Imagine Thousands Of Links Back To Your Web Site From Other People's Blogs!

  2. "No Charge Online Advertising Channels For Any Business"


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.