Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / LATEST MIP

LATEST MIP

-

The IPKat has been perusing the pages of the April 2005 issue of Euromoney's ten-times-a-year publication Managing Intellectual Property, which has a special 25 page focus on the Benelux countries (or at any rate on Belgium and the Netherlands; poor old Luxembourg wasn't much in evidence). Key features in this issue include:
* more news and comment on the great European soap opera that is the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive;

* an article by Gabriela Nunez on the Andean Pact countries' rules as they affect pharmaceutical patents;

* Gareth Morgan (Taylor Wessing) reviews some recent UK IP royalty cases, urging IP owners to become princes rather than paupers;

* further descriptions of IP protection in China and prescriptions for further protection.
LATEST MIP LATEST MIP Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, April 17, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.