IAM (Intellectual Asset Management) continues to produce some excellent editorial copy with the appearance of its issue 11 (April/May). Under the heading "Fighting Talk", Craig Opperman and Jason Schultz report on the bitter debate currently taking place over the patentability of computer software, while there are also good features on Dow Chemical's intellectual asset management policy by editor Joff Wild and on the new US Trade Mark Dilution Revision Act 2005 (now through Congress) by Adrian Preston.
FIGHTING TALK FROM IAM
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, April 14, 2005
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html