Fake footballers' signatures; kikoi returns

Trade marks send pair to jail

The IPKat learns from the BBC that Graeme Walker and Faisal Madani, who respectively sold and supplied fake football memorabilia, have received custodial sentences for fraudulent trading, breaches of the Trade Descriptions Act and infringement of the criminal provisions of the Trade Marks Act. The pair sold fake autographs of sporting personalities including Sir Alex Ferguson, Cristiano Ronaldo, Roy Keane, Steven Gerrard and Jonny Wilkinson. However, Walker was cleared of the headline-maker: selling a signed photograph of Michael Owen.

The IPKat was curious as to what the relevant trade marks actually are. A quick look at the Trade Marks Register suggests in the names in plain script, rather than the signatures themselves. The Kat wonders whether the footballers could have got their signatures registered. Would they have been memorable enough for consumers to use them to distinguish?

KIKOY applicant skirts the issue

Readers with good medium term memories may remember an application filed to protect KIKOY as a UK trade mark noted on the IPKat just over a year ago. This was controversial because it is the phonetic equivalent of ‘kikoi’, a form of Kenyan fabric used for skirts. The Daily Nation reports that the application has failed. However, none of the exciting trade mark issues (phonetic equivalent of a descriptive word, the morality of ‘locking out’ the tranditional users from marketing goods under the name in the UK) got an airing. Instead, the application was thrown out because the applicant failed to file a TM8.

The IPKat wonders if the applicant saw the outcry and thought better of it.

Fake footballers' signatures; kikoi returns Fake footballers' signatures; kikoi returns Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, April 03, 2008 Rating: 5


  1. I think in the Diana cases it was considered that only the signature was registrable - the plain script wasn't (for memorabilia etc)

  2. Keep an eye on the George Best signature CTM application, currently opposed by Walmart & Asda by the looks of the register.....


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.