Names in the news

Names are in the news today. The Telegraph reports that JK Rowling is fighting in a US court to stop the author of the Harry Potter Lexicon (here) exploiting the name and character of the fictional boy wizard by bringing a copyright infringement suit, while Jasper Conran is coming to the aid of his father Sir Terence Conran in seeking to prevent the use of that notorious surname by the less-well-known advertising giant Havas.

Without having heard the submissions or having seen the evidence, the IPKat doesn't want to hold out too much hope for either claimant. JK Rowling may find herself up against the transformative use defence, which seems to be riding high as a fair use doctrine in the United States these days. Meanwhile, the Conrans have to concede that Havas is legally entitled to use the name, which he lost in 1990 -- though he is reportedly willing to pay "a modest amount of money" to buy it back. Merpel adds, you can take precautions to keep your name -- registering it as a trade mark is one, and not assigning it to someone else is another -- but there's not much you can do to guard against fair use defences to copyright infringement.

The Kats will keep an eye or two on developments, and will report back in due course.
Names in the news Names in the news Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. The Harry Potter case reminds of:

    In that case somebody created a book with trivia questions on Seinfeld. IRC, the publisher lost that one. See:


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.