"We love you UKIPO" - and it's official

According to a survey of 468 users of its services at the end of last year, the UK Intellectual Property Office has hit a five year peak in customer satisfaction. UKIPO's website reports that 97.9% of users of its services expressed themselves happy with the UKIPO -- which was commended for its friendliness.

Says the IPKat, there must be some explanation: perhaps our readers would like to make some suggestions. Merpel sulks: 97.9%? Even my own friends don't score that high ...

Right: Patent examiners never used to be like this ...

How to make friends and influence people here and, less effectively, here
Teach yourself hypnosis here
Bribery here
"We love you UKIPO" - and it's official "We love you UKIPO"  -  and it's official Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, April 10, 2008 Rating: 5


  1. Perhaps its the contrast with the European Patent Office.

  2. Quite possibly Daniel, or indeed the OHIM for that matter.

    Makes you wonder also if the UK-IPO is secretly none to pleased with this outcome. After all, where else can you go from a 97.9% rating - apart from down ?

    Another point about these surveys is that it's rather like your heart surgeon asking you, as a patient, if you think they perfomed well. Well, you simply haven't got a clue; they smiled nicely...

  3. I worked for an American computer company that had a comprehensive customer satisfaction compensation plan for its employees. If salaries (or at least appreciation) depends on customer satisfaction, it becomes a trding itemt, that, unlike real money, can be created by the customers at will: "if give you some satisfaction if you do this-or-that for me". Well, to some extent that is natural, but it could end in outright corruption.

  4. A bit like the general "election" results in the former GDR... ;-)


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.