Last week in the European Parliament...

ZDNet reports that the European Parliament has approved two reports on the cultural industries which cast doubts on combating copyright infringement through cutting off offenders’ internet access.

A visit to the European Parliament’s website doesn’t make things much clearer.

One report calls for greater support for industries such as publishing and the music industry which are threatened by piracy.

In another report, French Socialist Guy Bono notes

“Criminalising consumers who are not seeking to make a profit is not the right solution to combat digital piracy…The central message of this report is to find a balance between the possibility to access cultural events and content while ensuring cultural diversity and genuine income to the right holders,"

Also discussed last week, and of interest to IP lawyers, was a European heritage label for goods, memorials and monuments to combat the “threat” of the globalisation of culture.

The IPKat reckons that rather than this being a contradiction, perhaps the EP is getting this right. There is a need to protect copyright owners, but not in a way that is disproportionate to the interests of the rest of society.

Last week in the European Parliament... Last week in the European Parliament... Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, April 14, 2008 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.