Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - all change?

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark, which codifies (and repeals) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark and its amendments, entered into force on Monday 13 April 2009.

This cat has just reviewed the changes to the Council Regulation

So, what has changed? The good news is that there is no change in the numbers of Articles 1 - 36, which means that all references to Article 7 (examination) and Article 8 (oppositions) are unaffected. However, oppositions are affected in other Articles. Furthermore, Articles referring to cancellations and appeals have changed as well as references to Articles 37 - 160.

If this sounds slightly confusing: the OHIM has published some helpful documentation which can be accessed via the links set out below.

Merpel just can't help wondering why the numbers of Articles had to change at all...
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - all change? Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - all change? Reviewed by Birgit Clark on Wednesday, April 15, 2009 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. true, why did they have to change the article numbers... anyone know?


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.