Tuesday twiglets

It's not often that an intellectual property blog finds itself in the thick of litigation, but that's just what has happened to the quiet, inoffensive Afro-IP weblog. SAMRO (the Southern African Music Rights Organisation) is bringing proceedings for defamation against the respected South African copyright expert Graeme Gilfillan in what has now become known as the Brenda Fassie affair (you can read all the details of the dispute if you read this item on Afro-IP and follow the various links). The allegedly defamatory words were circulated through Afro-IP's increasingly popular Google Group. Afro-IP will of course keep readers informed of subsequent developments.

The ever-vigilant Hugo Cox has spotted that the European Court of Human Rights is launching a new website to commemorate its 50th anniversary. The ECHR, better known for the endless stream of cases brought against East European governments by suffering humans, is also the tribunal that determined that the human rights of Anheuser-Busch Inc were not trampled on by Portugal when it magicked away one of that company's trade mark applications (see earlier post here). Merpel hopes the new website proves more user-friendly than the old one.

Also via Hugo Cox comes this helpful link to both the original Swedish text of The Pirate Bay judgment (it's 108 pages long) together with a surprisingly intelligible translation into English via Google. The same link takes readers to a piece by Carl Howe, "Pirate Bay versus the media business: both lost today", which is worth a second glance. NOTE: the original link is correct, but doesn't seem to work for a lot of people. If you have problems with it, go to Yankee Groups and scroll through the April 2oo9 posts to access it.

With the World Intellectual Property Organization's World Intellectual Property Day almost upon us, the IPKat has been well and truly chided (chidden? chid? chod?) by Mary Wyburn for neglecting to mention that Thursday 23 April happens to be World Book and Copyright Day, under the auspices of WIPO's troublesome wayward sister UNESCO. Mary assures us that she is not personally responsible for this event: she just happened to spot it [but where, Mary, have you been surfing, Merpel demands to know ..?].

If you like answering questions anonymously and don't have an iPod, this is for you. IP Review magazine is conducting a "state of the industry" survey. Says editor Emma Jones: "A growing awareness of the importance of intellectual property rights to business success has led to unprecedented growth and transformation in the IP sector in the past two decades, but where does the industry go now? In the current financial climate, IP professionals are coming under increasing pressure to reduce their management spend, while generating increased profits from their existing assets, but how are they meeting this challenge? IP Review’s anonymous state of the industry survey would like to track your views on the sector and its future, and your own management approach to IP and associated IP Rights. To take part, visit this site by 8 May 2009 and you will also be entered into our free prize draw to win an iPod Touch 8B and music surround system". Results will be released at this year’s INTA conference in Seattle and available here from 16 May.
Tuesday twiglets Tuesday twiglets Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 Rating: 5


  1. Re "better known for the endless stream of cases brought against East European governments by suffering humans," I quote from their 50th anniversary report: "More than half the judgments delivered by the Court concerned four of the Council of Europe’s 47 member States: Italy (1,953 judgments), Turkey (1,939 judgments), France (740 judgments) and Russia (643 judgments)."

  2. An 8-byte iPod touch? You're not going to fit much music on that...

  3. Re the first anonymous - by any normal definition of "Europe", ie which doesn't stretch to the far side of Asia, Turkey is the most Eastern European country. And if you start counting Russia as European, that's even further East.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.