3 comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
Now wondering how to treat the so-called repeat tweets ("retweets"), if tweets were protectable under copyright law, would retweeting then be covered by the right to quote? Can only think of the German Copyright Act at the moment, Art. 51 Urhebergesetz.
ReplyDeleteAnyone any ideas or is this all really not that important anyway?
'Retweets' are commonly referred to as 'tweet-tweets' and the practice is known as 'two-tweeting'.
ReplyDeleteWell, I'd say a tweet may at least bear the _potential_ of being copyrightable matter.
ReplyDeleteHere's why:
- A short poem would generally be accepted as qualified for copyright
protection
- The same will be true for a plurality of poems
- I just performed a "representative" study of 11 Heikus (in German), finding an average length of 65 characters
- This gives a potential of about two Heikus (i.e. a plurality of short poems) per tweet
So there's definitely potential for copyright protection.
But in fact most of the chirping I observe will - or at least should - never qualify for copyright protection; because it simply doesn't meet the standards of creative level..
-- my 680 characters --