20 million thanks

This Kat first joined the IPKat blog in 2012: the following year, the blog celebrated its 10 year anniversary and passed 9 million page views on the page view counter (which can be seen on the sidebar). In 2014, the blog notched up 10 million page views. Now, only a couple of years further on, the 20 million milestone has now just been passed.  The whole team is thrilled to reach this marker.

Now, more than ever, the blog is made possible by a large community including an extended team of permanent Kats, guest Kats, InternKats, other regular contributers and occasional guest post contributers, by which we endeavour to cover with some degree of balance the whole range of intellectual property and related topics.  The blog continues only thanks to the efforts of those writing posts, our dear readers, and our valued commenters (who post comments on many of the blogposts).  We continue to owe a huge debt to the wisdom and foresight of our beloved founder Jeremy Phillips for envisaging this enduring structure back when blogging was not a well established model for legal debate and commentary.

So our thanks from the IPKat and Merpel to all in the IP community who continue to read and support the blog.
20 million thanks 20 million thanks Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Friday, September 16, 2016 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. Hearty congratulations to you all! I'm so pleased to see this milestone reached -- and indeed exceeded -- through the efforts of this excellent team. Long may you all thrive!

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.