News from Europe - both from the North (Denmark) and the South (Spain) - and the USA for this edition of Around the IP Blogs!
Trade marks
Trade marks
This week the Kluwer Trademark Blog reports on two Danish decisions concerning trademark registrations for the name of a colour. In both decisions the Danish Board of Appeal found that the words at issue, Magenta and Cream, would be considered designations of
the colour of some of the goods applied for. It also reports on a Spanish decision holding that the representation of a dinosaur on a cookie should remain in the public domain.
Copyright
 |
| The coolest cat |
The 1709 Blog writes about two lawsuits in the Southern district of New York. The first suit has been filed by Gianluca Vacchi, a social media influencer, against an online investment company and itclaims “copyright infringement, as well as false endorsement and misappropriation of protectable character, protectable scenes, and image and persona of “the coolest man on Instagram.”. The second has been filed by photographer Robert Barbera against Versace USA: it claims that the fashion company did not have the right to publish, on its Instagram account, a photograph (registered by Barbera with the Copyright Office) of Jennifer Lopez wearing Versace.
Patents
PatentlyO has published several articles concerning 35 U.S.C. § 101. It reports on the New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas? and the reaction to the article in A Response to “Is there Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas?” by Prof. Joshua Sarnoff. Moreover in Does § 101 applies to Design Patents? it discusses the application of the provision to design patents. Moreover in How Smart is your Cleaning Robot? it discusses iRobot Corp. v. USITC (Fed. Cir. 2019), an appeal which focuses on iRobot’s U.S. Patent 9,486,924 allowing for scheduling of the cleaning via mobile phone.
Around the IP Blogs!
Reviewed by Antonella Gentile
on
Saturday, April 27, 2019
Rating:
Reviewed by Antonella Gentile
on
Saturday, April 27, 2019
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html