The AmeriKat's New York cousin - the Bodega cat. Don't mess with her. |
- Priority - the pitfalls of transferring priority rights from a European and US perspective
- Google v Oracle - past, present and future of the closely-watched copyright case
- DMCA: 20 Years Later - has the DMCA legislation solved business problems or caused them?
- EU Copyright Reform - update following the controversial adoption of the new EU Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market
- Artificial Intelligence - how does AI and machine learning fit into and change traditional models of IP.
- In-House Panel
- IP in China
- Updates on FRAND, SPCs, trade mark law, second medical use and more with presentations including:
Speakers include Mr Justice Arnold (High Court of Justice, London), Judge Rian Kalden (Court of Appeal of The Hague), Hon. Yoshiaki Shibata (Tokyo District Court), Judge Newman (CAFC), Nicholas Banasevic (Head of Unit, Antitrust, DG Competition), Professor Adelman (George Washington University Law School), Professor Daryl Lim (John Marshall Law School), Justin Watts (Wilmer Hale), Andrew Trask (Williams & Connolly), Jürgen Dressel, Jill (Yijun) Ge (Clifford Chance), Laura Sheridan (Google) and more.
- Of Celebrity Chefs, Gruesome Video Games and Astrophysicists: The Eclectic World of New Types of Marks - First Experiences at EUIPO
- Potholes, Manholes, and Landmines Along the FRAND SEP Highway
- Geographical Indications and the Textiles Industry in Developing Countries - the Case for Multilateral Protection
- Judges: Another Way to Harmonize the World for IP
- Can the Music Modernization Act’s Database Actually Solve the Music Licensing Problem?
IPKat in NY: Fordham IP Conference
Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward
on
Monday, April 22, 2019
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html