WIPO Lex-Judgments: the global free database of judicial decisions has been launched!

On 24 September 2020, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) launched its new free database WIPO Lex-Judgments, which contains judicial decisions on IP matters from around the world. 

The database can be accessed through the portal WIPO LEX, which already contains various IP laws and treaties worldwide. 

The features

WIPO Lex-Judgments is available in English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, French, and RussianSo far, the database comprises over 400 decisions from the following ten countries:


WIPO highlighted that the judgments were “selected directly by the courts or other national authorities of each member state as leading decisions due to their significant impact or precedential value”. Likewise, the judgments were issued inter alia by specialised courts and “administrative entities that carry out quasi-judicial functions”. 

The decisions can be reviewed in its original language and include automatic machine translation tools into several languages (WIPO Translate and Google Translate).

An overview of judicial administration structures for IP disputes is available on some of the profiles of the Member States [click below “Judgments (… Citations)”]. This section contains a summary of the administrative and judicial procedures, IP-specific features, case statistics, and links to the official databases of the judgments. 

The search criteria

WIPO Lex-Judgments allows searching for decisions per the following criteria: 

  • Country
  • Subject matter (e.g. copyright, patents, trademarks, enforcement of IP, geographical indications, competition, traditional knowledge [TK], traditional cultural expressions, transfer of technology)
  • Issuing authority (e.g. Specialized Court on IP, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court)
  • Level of the issuing authority (first, appellate, and final instance)
  • Type of procedure (administrative, civil, commercial, constitutional, administrative [judicial], criminal)
  • Relevant national legislation
  • Relevant treaties
  • Date of judgment
  • Relevant keywords
  
Considering that the database is part of WIPO LEX, cross-references to the applicable national laws and international treaties are available when a judgment is reviewed. 

It is expected that more decisions will continue to be added to the database. WIPO encourages Member States interested in contributing judgments to get in touch here

Comments

The launch of WIPO Lex-Judgments was widely expected. As WIPO stressed, the database “is a direct response to the needs expressed by numerous member states, initially from the Latin America and the Caribbean region (LAC region) and Spain”. 

In this sense, the database provides valuable insights into the judgments and courts’ reasonings from different jurisdictions. Likewise, it sheds light on the judicial administration structures for IP disputes of some countries. 

Overall, WIPO Lex-Judgments is a useful tool, in particular to practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. 

Certainly, this TechieKat is rubbing her paws to see more decisions from different jurisdictions added to WIPO Lex-Judgments

Watch here the video showing some highlights of the database! 


Sources: the press release published by WIPO and WIPO Lex-Judgments

Credit: image of Gerd Altmann on Pixabay.

WIPO Lex-Judgments: the global free database of judicial decisions has been launched! WIPO Lex-Judgments: the global free database of judicial decisions has been launched! Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo on Friday, September 25, 2020 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. WIPO Lex has been around for a long time and has never been very useful. This short list of countries and limited input (e.g. only 10 decisions from Australia - the only major common law jurisdiction so far) suggest that this is hardly a notable achievement. Hopefully, it will get better - much better.

    Uncle Wiggily

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.