Book review ”Proceedings before the European Patent Office” by Müller and Mulder

The book of Marcus Müller and Cees Mulder, “Proceedings before the European Patent Office. A Practical Guide to Success in Opposition and Appeal” is published under the Elgar Practical Guides series (2020).

It constitutes a very practical, clear and hands-on guide on EPO proceedings directed to both the experienced patent attorney due to its reference to important (and current) case-law as well as to its references to the 2020 Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal. It is also a perfect guide for patent attorneys that want to have a complete and detailed overview of the EPO proceedings as well as need strategic and practical advice.

What I really appreciated reading the book, is the way it combines the theoretical, legal framework, the extensive case-law references as well as the practical perspective, all coming together in a very pedagogic manner, with a clear structure and a number of explanatory illustrations. This is also why the book could with advantage be used in advanced courses in patent law.

The fact that the authors choose to start from the start, that is from the drafting and prosecution of the patent application provides the reader with the “whole picture”, and shows how strategic choices made at this stage influence opposition and appeal later on.

If you are interested in EPO proceedings, read the book!

Authors: Marcus O. Müller and Cees A.M. Mulder

Year of publication: 2020 (second edition)

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited

ISBN: 978 178811531 (cased)

Price: £44 (paperback)

The book is available as an eBook

Book review ”Proceedings before the European Patent Office” by Müller and Mulder Book review ”Proceedings before the European Patent Office” by Müller and Mulder Reviewed by Frantzeska Papadopoulou on Friday, October 02, 2020 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.