Heartache in Alicante - Find out what OHIM refuses

It has just come to the attention of the IPKat that the OHIM has (apparently very recently) now begun to publish information about Registered Community Design applications that have been refused.

The information can be accessed here.

For some time, the OHIM has published "Decisions of the Office", namely invalidity decisions and decisions of the Boards of Appeal. (Our dear readers may recall that these are periodically summarised in the Marques reports, reported for example here). The "Refused Designs" section has been added to these two categories.

The only information given in each case is the reason for refusal, and the design itself is not shown. The Regulation does not envisage publication of designs before acceptance. Therefore, the OHIM does not routinely publish designs if they are refused. Furthermore, if the designs were published, it may destroy their novelty, or create unregistered Community design rights. Therefore, the OHIM is not at liberty to publish them of its own accord.  Nevertheless, seeing the grounds of refusal and relative frequency of each will be a great help to practitioners.

Which is the real animal?
OHIM does not conduct examination on substantive grounds of novelty or individual character. Therefore, most of the grounds of refusal are mundane procedural matters to do with the number, quality, or type of representations, or that the representations do not relate to the same design.

The IPKat was hoping to see refusals based on designs which are contrary to public policy or morality, but alas so far no such decisions are listed.

The most amusing reason for refusal found was "Not a Community Design as the representation shows a real animal". Was the applicant sending a snapshot of their pet, Merpel wonders.

Heartache in Alicante - Find out what OHIM refuses Heartache in Alicante - Find out what OHIM refuses Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Wednesday, April 18, 2012 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.