Around the IP Blogs

In this Thanksgiving season, this Kat is grateful that the IPKat readers continue following the posts of The IPKat blog. But also other blogs have lots to offer: to show appreciation for the efforts of the IP bloggers’ community, this Kat searched and found some interesting posts.  

All I need is you.

On the Kluwer Copyright Blog, Jan Bernd Nordemann reported the AIPPI’s Resolution on the copyright in artificially generally generated works. The resolution concludes that there should be no copyright protection for AI works without human input, but related rights may be considered to reward the investment in the creation of such works. 

Trade marks
Marques Class 46 blog reports that the European Union is joining the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications. With the addition of the EU as the 15th member, the Act can now enter into force.

On the SpicyIP blog, Pankhuri Agarwal reported on the Delhi High Court’s decision in Bayer Healthcare and Bristol Myers Squibb v. Natco, which held that an order in an interim injunction application must necessarily indicate that the court has considered the three elements of a well-settled test, i.e. prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable harm, before reaching a conclusion as regards the grant or non-grant of the injunction.

On PatentlyO, Dennis Crouch prepared a list of recent Federal Circuit’s decisions on the doctrine of equivalents. He also used one sentence to indicate the essential rule in each of the decisions.

Online Piracy 
On the CREATe Blog, Amy Thomas reported on new empirical study on Global online piracy. Joost Poort’s study (together with João Pedro Quintais) provides a comprehensive overview of the state of online piracy, including piracy rates, motivations and its impact on consumption from legal sources.
Around the IP Blogs Around the IP Blogs Reviewed by Kan He on Friday, November 29, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.