[Guest post] A Christmas wish for Jamaica – The 2020 Patent and Designs Act promises good tidings and an “irie” New Year
The IPKat is delighted to host the following contribution by Dr Natalie Corthèsy, Associate Dean of Outreach and Continuing Legal Education and Lecturer in Law at The Faculty of Law The University of the West Indies Mona Campus Jamaica, on recent IP developments in her beautiful home country.
Here's what Natalie writes:
A Christmas wish for Jamaica – The 2020 Patent and Designs Act promises good tidings and an “irie”* New Year
by Natalie Corthésy
Christmas in Jamaica ... one can dream! |
The PCT, administered by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has 153 contracting States, and allows inventors to benefit from a single priority date when filing for a patent in multiple jurisdictions. However, the decision to grant a patent remains exclusively within the remit of each national office. For new contracting states like Jamaica, the PCT will only come into force three months after the date on which Jamaica has deposited its instrument of ratification and accession.
Although the protraction of the old law makes applying for a patent in Jamaica undesirable for the time being, the new Act holds much promise as it aligns with internationally accepted standards characteristic of modern patent regimes, in particular as it relates to application, grant of monopoly rights, infringement and remedies. Regrettably, it does not do what patent enthusiasts, AI enthusiasts in particular, might hope a new patent Act would. PDAJ does not offer a definition of “inventor”. Perhaps the most notable change heralded in by the PDAJ is the introduction of an international standard of novelty. The requirement of novelty under the outgoing law is that the invention must be new, meaning it must not be known or used in the Island of Jamaica before. Arguably, this lower threshold augers well for easier access to innovation and technology given the country’s status as an emerging economy. [Aaron Graham, Patents and Invention in Jamaica and the British Atlantic before 1857, 29 July, 2020 EHR Vol.73, Issue 4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.12995 ]. Currently, JIPO carries out a search of patent and non-patent literature to determine whether an invention claimed is indeed new to Jamaica by conducting a search process that includes referrals of to the National Chemist, and The Bureau of Standards.
However, once the PDAJ comes into force, and proof of international novelty is required, referrals will also be necessary to an International Search Authorities (ISA) to be designated by JIPO. There are 23 ISAs worldwide, including the European Patent Office, the US Patent Office, Russian Federation, Japan, India, Israel, Brazil, and Canada. The UK voluntarily agreed to cease being an ISA in favour of the European Patent Office.
The 2020 edition of WIPO’s Global Innovation Index (GII), which presents the latest global innovation trends and the annual innovation ranking of 131 economies, ranked Jamaica 72nd. This is an improvement on Jamaica’s ranking in previous years. Modernization of the country’s patent regime thus reflects a clear policy objective to propel Jamaica’s innovation machinery into full throttle by providing an up to date statutory framework to foster innovation, enable sustainable economic growth and promote development. This strategic move brought swift results as shortly after the promulgation of PDAJ, Jamaica was removed from one of Santa’s most notorious IP naughty lists – the USA’s 301 Trade Representative “watch list” which the country has been on for decades. “The Special 301 Report identifies trading partners that do not adequately or effectively protect and enforce IP rights or otherwise deny market access to US innovators and creators that rely on protection of their IP rights” (here).
*Jamaican expression meaning “good or everything is alright”.
[Guest post] A Christmas wish for Jamaica – The 2020 Patent and Designs Act promises good tidings and an “irie” New Year
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, November 18, 2020
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html