SIPLR Event: IP in the Digital Environment

Since its creation in 2018, the Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review (SIPLR) has held an annual conference, inviting prominent speakers in the IP field to discuss current issues of import. This year, this Kat is delighted to be involved in its organisation as Co-Chief Editor of SIPLR, alongside Kats Frantzeska Papadopoulou and Eleonora Rosati, as well as my fellow Co-Chief Editor Alexandre Miura.

SIPLR will be holding this year's conference, titled 'IP in the Digital Environment', online on Thursday 3 December 2020, from 14:30-16:30 CET.

The keynote address will be delivered by Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of Appeal in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. The title of his talk will be 'Website-Blocking Injunctions and Streaming Server-Blocking Injunctions: The State of the Art'.

Topics to be covered will also include:

  • 'Website-Blocking from the Swedish Perspective': Karin Cederlund (Sandart & Partners) and Stefan Johansson (Swedish Patent and Market Court); and 
  • 'Roasting the host: from the safe harbour to the direct liability of platforms in P cases': Eleonora Rosati (Stockholm University).
The event is free to attend, and if you are interested you can register here.

Hope to see you there!

SIPLR Event: IP in the Digital Environment SIPLR Event: IP in the Digital Environment Reviewed by Riana Harvey on Monday, November 09, 2020 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.