3 comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
Am not sure Japan and China will be joining the party soon, as I hazard a guess that unearthing prior art in the two languages, more than the other languages, is probably the major reason for the supplementary search.
ReplyDeleteThis presaging Powerpoint presentation from a few months back suggests that you shouldn't hold your breath for Japan or the US to join the party. China's a possibility, though.
ReplyDeleteWhat's interesting to me is that the EPO are looking to join in in 2010. Not very useful for Europeans, but possibly a big deal for US applicants with an interest in the EP who could get a US and an EPO search at the same time. Waits to be seen whether the EPO will offer any search fee reduction on entry into the European phase - I'm not hopeful.
The JPO is not opposed to the SISR system, but will not participate. First of all, it takes the view that the ISA should be encouraged to do good job in the first place. Secondly, it is afraid that it would be inundated with SIS requests.
ReplyDelete