Did you read the latest wonderful posts of some IP blogs? If not, this InternKat is delighted to help you out!
 |
| Check it out, kitten! |
Moving to trademarks, MARQUES Class 46 blog announced the publication by Sweet & Maxwell of the monthly European Trade Mark Reports (ETMR). The November 2016 issue includes reports of recent decisions from IP offices, national and EU courts. MARQUES members are encouraged to provide European full decisions (in English) of disputes of significant interest to be consider for publication in the following issues.
Staying with trademarks, Michal Havlík commented on Kluwer Trademark Blog the Czech Supreme Court decision finding the company Czech Trade Internet s.r.o. liable for submitting an incomplete take-down notice to Facebook requesting deactivation of the government agency Czech Trade profile based on alleged trademark infringement.
Moving to the political arena, Michael Geist blogged about the impact of US presidential election on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement and how the re-negotiation of NAFTA might insert the TPP IP provisions into Canadian law.
Staying with trademarks, Michal Havlík commented on Kluwer Trademark Blog the Czech Supreme Court decision finding the company Czech Trade Internet s.r.o. liable for submitting an incomplete take-down notice to Facebook requesting deactivation of the government agency Czech Trade profile based on alleged trademark infringement.
Moving to the political arena, Michael Geist blogged about the impact of US presidential election on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement and how the re-negotiation of NAFTA might insert the TPP IP provisions into Canadian law.
Over at IP Draughts, Mark Anderson discussed the proposal for creating a Royal Academy of Innovation and Creativity (RAIC) in the eve of the enquiry made by the Science and Technology Committee of the British House of Commons. The cross-disciplinary RAIC would provide a focus for policy, education, research in the fields of innovation and creativity, among other functions.
And finally, the IPKat is delighted to learn of a recently started IP blog TrustinIP, launched by four authors from the MIPLC, Hirotaka Nonaka, Marco Lo Bue, Vilhelm Schröder and Yangjin Li. The blog has an interesting international lineup and covers topical issues in IP and antitrust law. Hirotaka Nonaka recently shared some strategies regarding the invalidity of a patent asserted within an infringement proceeding started before the courts (double track system) in Japan. More details of the double track system as compared with the bifurcation system can be read, here.
And finally, the IPKat is delighted to learn of a recently started IP blog TrustinIP, launched by four authors from the MIPLC, Hirotaka Nonaka, Marco Lo Bue, Vilhelm Schröder and Yangjin Li. The blog has an interesting international lineup and covers topical issues in IP and antitrust law. Hirotaka Nonaka recently shared some strategies regarding the invalidity of a patent asserted within an infringement proceeding started before the courts (double track system) in Japan. More details of the double track system as compared with the bifurcation system can be read, here.
Around the IP Blogs!
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Rating:
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html