This Kat has been surfing about the
IP blogosphere and has returned with some very interesting
articles for your digestion and rumination!
Up for a bike ride in Christiania,
Copenhagen? Well you will find yourself in the midst of an in-fight
between CHRISTIANIA BIKES and CHRISTIANIA CYKLER (which happens
to be the Danish translation of the former). For the Kluwer Trademark
Blog, Lasse Søndergaard Christensen and Louise Thorning Ahle.
Snooping for some perspectives on
copyright, The 1709 Blog reported on US litigation about
pre-1972 (year in which recordings started to be subject to federal
copyright) copyright issues of the 60s band “The Turtles”. In
The CopyKat. Friday the 13th without Jason Voorhees, sounds like a
nightmare!, the actions of the association Alliance
for Creativity and Entertainment and the deal
with YouTube of the American Society of Composers, Authors and
Publishers in this specific field of copyright law are also
discussed.
In Canadian news, after years of
consistent Supreme Court decisions about fair dealing in schools and
universities, Federal
Court Judge Hands Access Copyright Fair Dealing Victory: Micheal
Geist reports on the reasoning of the court and the repercussions of
the judgement.
On to trade marks, in Mexico the
Tequila dispute is burning up! Are you Desperados
for Tequila? The famous beer brand Desperados, which uses the
appellation of origin “Tequila”, might be facing litigation as
the tequila industry frowns upon the situation and, more importantly,
Tequila has been granted a Certification Mark in the US. Florelia
Vallejo Trujillo of IP tango reports on the news.
Maybe I could take the bike out today... nah, window watching it is |
In The
link between passing-off and provenance, Darren Margo and Natalie
Hill of Afro-IP, talk about the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment
Herbal Zone v Infitech Technologies. The South African
judgement “covers that situation where an ex distributor turns
competitor, and what is then required to stop that business selling
products bearing the same name. It is also a reminder on the
importance of registering a trade mark”.
Turning to designs and patents
accordingly, BMW
AG v Acacia Srl reported
by MARQUES, involved the latter company manufacturing and selling
on-line replicas of BMW and other car brands' wheels. Acacia sought
the Italian Courts for a declaration of non-infringement. The case
centered on whether the Italian Court have jurisdiction and,
ultimately, the
CJEU confirms lex
specialis
status of jurisdiction under the Design Regulation.
The
second case, Intermarine
v. CMC Marine, dealt
with the request for the declaration of invalidity of an utility
model by Intermarine. CMC counter argued that not only the model was
valid but that could even be converted into a patent. The Court of
Appeal of Turin (Italy) sided with Intermarine as explained by Luca
Giove in EPLAW.
Anthony McCain of PatentlyO proposes some Bits and Bytes to nibble on as wells as The Copycat of The1709 Blog!
And lastly, the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice proposes an interesting editorial on Control of Content in Social Media where the author Gill Grassie asks whether the legislator could in this context learn something from the IP enforcement experience.
Image credits: Cecilia Sbrolli
Anthony McCain of PatentlyO proposes some Bits and Bytes to nibble on as wells as The Copycat of The1709 Blog!
And lastly, the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice proposes an interesting editorial on Control of Content in Social Media where the author Gill Grassie asks whether the legislator could in this context learn something from the IP enforcement experience.
Image credits: Cecilia Sbrolli
Around the IP Blogs
Reviewed by Cecilia Sbrolli
on
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html