 |
| The AmeriKat has adopted one means of keeping things secret.... |
But this morning the stalking came to an end with the publication of Directive (EU) 2016/943 - otherwise known as the EU Trade Secrets Directive - in the Official Journal (see link here). The publication comes almost three weeks after the Council unanimously adopted the Directive (see post here).
Under Article 20, the Directive:
"...shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union."Which means that the Directive will come into force on 5 July 2016. Member States have a maximum of two years to incorporate the Directive's provisions into domestic law.
For the Official Journal entry click here
For a copy of Directive 2016/943 click here
For previous IPKat posts on trade secrets click here
EU Trade Secrets Directive to come into force on 5 July 2016
Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward
on
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Rating:
Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward
on
Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Rating:
![[Guest Post] Can the Government Get Your Copyright? The Supreme Court of Canada Says “Yes”.](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Z3o7kc_ZdDM/XZc-2lsqRgI/AAAAAAAAA6Y/Ndh8PBEqEi0dPSsNHp9JRZZsfrlsFXc1QCLcBGAsYHQ/s72-c/Bunsen%2BJeremy%2Bcat.png)
![Guest Post: Copyright Troll-[ing] Canadian Courts? Canada’s First Reverse Class Action Copyright Case](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ukAUoSn0PIU/XYnJj2HHySI/AAAAAAAABdg/ohftHAtkFpAq9gso6Ua5Z22ygOdM7n6lACLcBGAsYHQ/s72-c/44017360790_1fe50052f2_o.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html