Latest Copyright World; The guru returns

Getting a little behind with his reading, the IPKat has only just got to the March 2007 issue of Copyright World, the colourful journal published by Informa. The cover story is a discussion by English solicitor Graham Simkin and US attorney Kevin Smith, both from Fulbright & Jaworski International, of some of the implications for love-it-or-hate-it digital rights management (DRM or nightmare?) of human rights law and competition law. Other topics covered include
* Gadi Oron (legal adviser, IFPI), giving a crisp, simple account of the ECJ's ruling in the Spanish reference in SGAE v Rafael Hoteles as to whether the provision of TV programmes to hotel rooms constituted an act of communication to the public for which royalties might be legitimately sought;

* "A Whiter Shade of Pale" by Best & Soames' Hubert Best, a commentary on the recent UK copyright litigation over authorship of the 1960s Procol Harum classic;

* "Brave New World", by Jeremy Miles and Dan Caunt (Field Fisher Waterhouse) on the potential legal liability of distributors of user-generated content (a coded term for YouTube and its emulators).
Contents of the current issue of Copyright World here

IPKat co-blogger Jeremy has just spotted this news item on the website of The Lawyer headed "Olswang bolsters tech team with ex-Slaughters TMT guru". The guru concerned is his old friend and former student Nigel Swycher, who left Slaughter and May a while ago after taking a year-long sabbatical on the West Coast with California litigation boutique Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Lloyd & Hedges LLP. Nigel is taking up a newly created role of Head of Technology at Olswang.

The IPKat wishes Nigel well in his new position.
Latest Copyright World; The guru returns Latest <i>Copyright World</i>; The guru returns Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.