InfoReport reports that RIAA is opposing a newly introduced US Bill. Snappily entitled the Freedom and Innovation Revitalizing U.S. Entrepreneurship (FAIR USE) Act, the bill would create exceptions to the DMCA anti-circumvention provisions, enabling users to decrypt copy protection for certain fair use reasons deemed not to conflict with copyright owners’ business models. However, RIAA has said the Bill would
"allow electronics companies to induce others to break the law for their own profit…"
"The difference between hacking done for non-infringing purposes and hacking done to steal is impossible to determine and enforce".
The IPKat rather doubts if things are as bad as all that. Even if RIAA is correct, the wide-scale circulation of such works would still be actionable under ‘traditional’ copyright law.
US FAIR USE Bill US FAIR USE Bill Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, March 01, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.