More Welsh news

The IPKat has been informed by the Patent Office that the Government of Wales Act 2006 will be making a few modifications to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 once the Act comes into force immediately after this year's elections in Wales.

Schedules 10 and 12 of the Act will remove Crown Copyright (section 163: first owner: HM the Queen) from works produced by the National Assembly for Wales, because after the elections the Assembly will not be a Crown body. Instead, the Assembly will own the copyright itself and will be allowed to decide what to do with it, as has already happened for the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly. The term of protection will also be reduced from its current 125 years to a mere 50 years.

The whole concept of Crown Copyright tends to grate against this Kat's principles of commonsense and fair play. Haven't we (as UK subjects) already paid for these works to be created? The very idea that the government has a right to sell back to us what we already own doesn't seem very fair. Perhaps the new Welsh assembly will want to take a more sensible stand on the matter. Then again, says Merpel, don't hold your breath: they will probably want as much power as they can get hold of.

More arguments against Crown Copyright here.
More Welsh news More Welsh news Reviewed by David Pearce on Thursday, March 22, 2007 Rating: 5


  1. Some Crown copyright material has value and arguably should not be subject to available for free copying - Ordnance Survey maps are a good example. Also, government departments are getting leaned on to make money any which way they can.

  2. I agree that the OS data has value, but I don't agree that we should have to pay twice for it, and very much object to the government's 'trading fund' operations. So many more applications for OS data could be freed up if the data could be made freely available, as is the case for the US. I recommend reading more on the Guardian's 'free our data' campaign (see link above).


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.