 |
| Kat in a tube |
On Thursday, Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe will issue his much-awaited Opinion in Joined Cases YouTube, C-682/18 and Cyando, C-683/18.
The issues at the centre of these important referrals - on which see at greater length here and here - revolve around the key issue of whether platforms which make available user-uploaded content perform an act of communication to the public under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.
Other issues include:
- The availability of the hosting safe harbour in Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive to platforms which communicate to the public
- Injunctions under Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive
- Damages under the Enforcement Directive
Here are further details about the Speakers and the Chair:
Speakers
Lauri Rechardt, Chief Legal Officer, IFPI; qualified Finnish lawyer; formerly partner and head of IP at Procopé & Hornborg, Finland and a director of Gramex, the Finnish Performing Artists and Record Producers Copyright Society.
Julia Reda, a former Member of the European Parliament from Germany; now leading the copyright litigation project control © at German fundamental rights NGO Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte.
Dr Eleonora Rosati, of IPKat; Associate Professor in IP Law (Stockholm University); Avvocato (Of Counsel with Bird & Bird); Editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice; BLACA Committee member and much more besides.
Chair
Jeremy Blum, partner at Bristows, London/Brussels; acted in cases such as L'Oreal v eBay, Cadbury v Nestle and Glaxo v Sandoz/Vectura, qualified in England & Wales/New Zealand; contributor, Kluwer Copyright Blog and Co-Editor of Brand Protection Online.
If you wish to join the discussion, please register here.
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
Announcing Joint IPKat/BLACA Live Webinar on YouTube/Cyando CJEU copyright case
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, July 13, 2020
Rating:
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, July 13, 2020
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Asking ourselves ‘Y’ – Are shape marks shaping complex products’ aftermarkets?](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHwE0es_m0lzJpedp0KFtKOYBne_M3YPJ-qwQxiY_YMkHffLAAXkSW9F-pjQFKsy5kJJ-VWScQQkuEVb5-BxnDv10XIMAbYhvgzBSQadD1gdTiIjg9-Oj9Iekll-C3Ca9I76uI3Hh5nCI4QyLosLSNev9VzLq9lF1jM86ungheEDOBKLzGTbE3yw/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Flat rates supported by clauses on universality of repertoire in contracts between CMOs and users are anti-competitive, says Spanish Competition Authority](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpBg7o3d7DPzH4YqNz3DUV5J5_sS4P7X7ZznFNETyQlLe0gonaSi3eE_jdjHD_aIjbPKhgpvUrkg6tPprYQYdwDGiyuWIXty9BOUlc07wUVbjDxI1bHoVxZA0ZCC9HBPjLXQwUioBSd9e9n-Z3uCeJ9UUgEvtJHLo1AllR20HGJETFdKoovxLBMw/s72-c/images.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html