Copyright & the CJEU: an afternoon of discussion ... and copyright fun!

There is now exactly one month to go before the publication of Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Oxford University Press), a new monograph which discusses the role and action of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the copyright field, as well as the legacy of this growing body of case law.

To celebrate in part the launch of the book but, above all, to take yet another opportunity to delve into what is possibly everyone's favourite topic of conversation, ie copyright & the CJEU, IPKat readers are warmly invited to a few hours of discussion on the impact of CJEU action on the construction of both EU and national copyright laws.

This event, which will be in the form of a panel discussion, will take place in the afternoon of Tuesday, 26 March 2019 and will be kindly hosted by Bird&Bird at its London offices.

The panel will feature:

With a contribution from Alberto Bellan.

The event will start at 16:30 (registrations from 16:00) and end at around 18:30, followed by drinks and canapés. 

The official hashtag for the event will be #cjeucopyright.

If you are interested in attending, just sign up here. Hurry up because places are limited!
Copyright & the CJEU: an afternoon of discussion ... and copyright fun! Copyright & the CJEU: an afternoon of discussion ... and copyright fun! Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Monday, January 21, 2019 Rating: 5

2 comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.