The 209th
edition of Never Too Late is out! Waste no time catching up with The IPKat’s
recent insights!
Copyright
Kat Eleonora Rosati analyses the Advocate General’s opinion in Pelham
and Others, C-476/17, which was referred to the CJEU by the German Federal
Court of Justice. A longstanding and complex litigation in Germany addressed an unauthorized
sampling of a 2-second rhythmic sequence. The CJEU
is asked whether a phonogram
sampling an earlier phonogram is a copy
within the meaning of Article 9(1)(b) of the Rental
and Lending Rights Directive. BREAKING:
AG Szpunar advises CJEU to rule that unlicensed sampling MAY be a copyright
infringement and German free use may be contrary to EU law.
In a follow-up post, Eleonora dives deeper into AG’s reasoning analysis. The
AG Opinion in Metall auf Metall: it's not a fundamental rights violation to say
that sampling requires a licence. AG addressed the concept
of 'reproduction in part' in Article 2 of the InfoSoc
Directive and whether it should be intended as also
encompassing the taking part of a
phonogram for inclusion in another phonogram. Also, can a phonogram that contains the sample be regarded as a 'copy' of the first
recording within Article 9(1)(b) of the Rental
and Lending Rights Directive? And finally, under Article 13
of the
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, is copyright protection in the phonogram trumped by the need to safeguard the freedom
of (artistic) expression of the person who does the sampling?
The newly appointed AG Gerard Hogan, from Ireland, has recently issued an Opinion in another German case, VG
Media, C-299/17, relating to the enforceability of the German
press publishers' right. The AG has advised the CJEU to rule that the German
Government failed to notify the Commission as
required for a 'technical regulation' under Article 8(1) of Directive
98/34, and that such failure to comply with this
obligation means that the right is unenforceable. Eleonora Rosati
reviews: AG
Hogan advises CJEU to rule that German press publishers' right is unenforceable.
Book Review Editor Hayleigh Bosher attended the ERA annual Conference on EU Copyright Law in
Trier, Germany on the 22nd and 23rd November. The event involved two days of
discussions focused on EU copyright reform as well as the interplay between
copyright and fundamental rights. Here are
Hayleigh’s highlights from the event: EU
Copyright Reform, Fundamental Rights & Life as CJEU Judge at the ERA
Copyright Conference
Trade Marks
There can never be too much purrple |
GuestKat Rosie Burbidge has published the
third and final post in the series
on the Second Brand Protection Conference in Frankfurt. The post reflects on Mette Andersen's talk about the LEGO brand
protection experience and lessons learned within the LEGO Group: Building
a Long Term Brand Protection solution - the Lego story [Part 3]
Rosie reviews
an appeal filed against The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade
Marks, which concerned Cadbury's attempt to amend the description of the mark
that consists of the colour purple: Whole
visible surface or predominant colour? Cadbury's plays spot the series mark.The High Court of England and Wales denied the appeal.
Kat friend Samuel Wee from
Yusarn Audrey provides a helpful discussion on a recent decision
of the Singapore High Court involving the "Monster"
mark. The court provided guidance on how to treat a word that is arguably the
dominant portion of a mark and, in particular, when that word is the subject of
a registration by another party. Trade
marks: the limits to a MONSTER’s reach in Singapore.
Patents
Katfriends Charlie French (one of this year's Young EPLAW mock trial award winners) and Edward
Nodder of Bristows report on EPLAW’s annual congress, which was held in Brussels and presented an
engaging debate on the latest issues and developments in European patent law. EPLAW
Congress Report: Who has the better patent litigation tools in Europe?
IPR Carousel
Kat friend (and tennis aficionado) John Shaw offers
his views on the most notable IP issues that arose during the 2018 tennis
season. IP-oriented tennis buffs include the design right in Serena Williams’ super-hero
style catsuit outfit at French Open, the sponsorship implications for re-naming
the grass court tournament at Queens Club and the trade mark issue of Roger
Federer’s “RF” logo. Tennis
in 2018: Did intellectual property hold serve?
In Polish
Constitutional Tribunal declares provision transposing right of information
partly unconstitutional, Katfriend Bohdan
Widła discussed whether the right of information, which is provided for in Article 8(1) of the Enforcement
Directive, is compatible with the values that Poland recognises in its
constitution. The Polish
Constitutional Tribunal has
ruled that this might not always be the case.
Book Reviews
Authored by Michael Tappin QC, Daniel Alexander QC,
Charlotte May QC, Adrian Speck QC, Iona Berkeley, Lindsay Lane, James Whyte,
Quentin Cregan, Jaani Riordan, Isabel Jamal, Ashton Chantrielle, Maxwell Keay
and Tom Jones and spread over two volumes, Laddie,
Prescott and Vitoria: The Modern Law of Copyright Fifth edition, is
essential reading for any
copyright practitioner. GuestKat Rosie reviews: Book
Review: The Modern Law of Copyright AKA Laddie, Prescott and Vitoria.
Book Review Editor Hayleigh Bosher writes about Giancarlo Frosio's (Université
de Strasbourg) book, which thoroughly and thoughtfully examines the history of
(mostly western) cultural history from cave art to digital remix in order to
demonstrate the conflict between traditional cumulative creativity and modern
copyright policy. Book
Review: Reconciling Copyright with Cumulative Creativity
Weekly Roundups:
Never Too Late; and Around the
IP Blogs!
Image Credits: megipupu
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never Too Late
208 [Week ending 9 Dec] Commercial
use of image rights: Paris Tribunal boosts models and performers’ protection | General
rules on direct and indirect liability for copyright infringement instead of
Art. 13 | Double trouble: fresh CJEU reference from Swedish Supreme Court
regarding scope of communication to the public inside cars | BREAKING NEWS: The
first Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List has been published! | First blocking
orders issued in Greece ... but how effective are they? | ECtHR rules that
prohibiting linking to defamatory content might be freedom of expression
violation: what implications (if any) for copyright? | Protecting reggae –
Cultural heritage needs IP | Revenge porn: …still no IP rights in sight | BREAKING:
TBA decides that Rule 28(2) EPC, excluding plant products produced by
essentially biological processes from patentability, is void | ”Baby you can
drive my car” period is over. Welcome the Self-driving vehicles | Brand
Protection - fresh perspectives from a Frankfurt conference [Part 1]; and Brand
Protection Conference [Part 2] | New joint IPKat/BLACA event! The topic is ...
Copyright and Artificial Intelligence | Book review: Copyright law and
derivative works
Never Too Late
207 [Week ending 2 Dec] draft
Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market: Contractual override and
the new exceptions in the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Proposal |
Venice court tackles copyright protection for architectural works as applied to
yachts | Marrakesh Treaty
is no paper tiger: EU Commission sues 17 countries for non-compliance | Give Africa its cultural heritage back … But keep its
digital cultural heritage? | The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious
story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet
trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis |
Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in
Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? EU General Court explains how
the relevant assessment is to be undertaken | High Court employs ‘intention to
target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark
infringement case | There's a new IPO report on designs infringement -
game-changer or stating the obvious? | Thursday Thunders
Never Too Late
206 [Weeks ending
18 and 25 Nov] BREAKING: CJEU says NO to copyright in the taste of a cheese |
The Levola Hengelo CJEU decision: ambiguities, uncertainties ... and more
questions | Enforcing copyright in government documents? Not as uncommon as one
might think | Linda Nochlin, "Why Have There Been No Great Women
Artists"? Relevant as ever, controversial as ever, | Buyers beware! …You
may owe re-sale right royalties | BREAKING NEWS: Supreme Court unanimously
dismisses Warner-Lambert's painful Lyrica appeal | Why is this Kat laughing
(hint: it's all about his blue shirt)? | AIPPI Rapid Response event - Unwired
Planet (Court of Appeal decision) | Take your seat at the Bench: an evening
with the IP/tech judges | General Court annuls Delegated Regulation 665/2013 on
energy labelling of vacuum cleaners | Book review: Artist, Authorship & Legacy:
A Reader | Book review: Cross-Border Copyright Licensing: Law and Practice
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Ieva Giedrimaite
on
Monday, January 07, 2019
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html